Ultimate Disproof of the Big Bang Comes from Its Bizarre Prediction that Photons Are Permanently Inscribed with H's Value at Time of Origin

Abstract

A noted cosmologist has utilized big bang's expanding spacetime redshift expression, z_exp = ℜ / ℜ_e − 1, and the astronomical redshift expression, z = λ / λ_e − 1, to obtain an expression for the predicted present rate of photon wavelength change induced by expansion, here denoted by (dλ / dt)_exp. When this expression is simplified in terms of the values of H, the present value of the Hubble constant, and H_e, its value at the time of emission of photons from distant galaxies, there results an expression showing the present rate of photon wavelength change depends on both the present value of the Hubble constant, as well as its value at the time of emission in distant galaxies, namely, (dλ / dt)_exp = Hλ − H_eλ_e. This bizarre result requires two things: First, because of big bang's homogeneity assumption, all photons in the universe must be simultaneously undergoing the changes specified by this expression; this is nothing less than on-going, instantaneous action-at-a-distance all throughout the universe's thirty-billion-lightyear diameter. Second, the fact that it requires not only individual photons be initially imprinted with H's value, corresponding to their respective times of origin, but also that this imprint should determine the rate of present wavelength expansion is proof that the expansion hypothesis has always stood in contradiction to all of modern physics.

Parts 2 through 5 of this series have already shown several reasons why the F-L expansion postulate involved results and requirements, such as nonconservation of energy, that contradicted known physical laws. We now show its existence would have involved still another anomaly, thus far virtually overlooked.

In theory the expression, λ = (ℜ / ℜ_e)λ_e, says that all photons emitted at time t_e, with wavelength, λ_e, when the expansion factor was ℜ_e, will now at time t, possess the same λ for the same ℜ. Thus, since the Friedmann-Lemaitre universe was presumed to be homogeneous and isotropic, then the rate of wavelength change, dλ / dt, due to expansion at any specific point in the cosmos would have been instantaneously identical with the rate at any other point in the universe. And, since dλ / dt was itself presumed to be changing, homogeneity would have required universal, instantaneous synchronization of this change in every photon throughout the universe's thirty-billion-light-year diameter. Since the CBR photon number density is about 410 cm⁻³, then the total number of photons throughout the cosmos in the CBR alone is more than 10⁸⁵. Added to that number would of course be those in starlight and other forms of electromagnetic radiation. Thus, in some way that was never defined by modern physics, expansion's effects were required to instantly and synchronously induce specific wavelength changes to more than 10⁸⁵ photons, irrespective of their location throughout the cosmos. 

As we will now show, the foregoing conclusions are a direct consequence of Weinberg's attempt to determine if it was possible to detect a present-day change in a galaxy's redshift due to the effects of expansion [1]. Thus we turn attention to Weinberg's derivation of expansion's presumed effect on the present rate of change of a photon's redshift, which is on page 451 of his book [1]. If we let ℜ = ℜ(t) and ℜ_e = ℜ(t_e) represent respectively the cosmic scale factors at some arbitrary time, t, at the present, and at some time of emission, t_e, from some distant galaxy, then the hypothesized expression for the expansion redshift is written as z_exp = ℜ / ℜ_e − 1

Differentiating this expression with respect to t, the present time coordinate, Weinberg first obtains

or

and then utilizes the substitution dt_e / dt = ℜ_e / ℜ from his equation 14.3.4 on page 416, to obtain

which is his equation 14.6.23, as it appears on page 451. By definition the value of the Hubble constant at present is H = ℜ^⋅/ ℜ, and its value at time t_e is presumed to have been H_e = ℜ^⋅_e / ℜ_e. If we first rewrite Eq. (3) as 

and then utilize the foregoing values for the Hubble constant, we obtain

As noted in Part 2 of this series, for high z objects the expansion redshift, z_exp = ℜ / ℜ_e − 1, is assumed to be the main component of the observed redshift, z_obs = λ / λ_e − 1. So in this case big-bang cosmology leads to the hypothesized expression,

Since λ_e is always assumed a constant, then from z_obs = λ / λ_e − 1 we find

Substitution of Eqs. (6) and (7) into Eq. (5) yields

Before discussing the implications of Eq. (8), we pause to again define its parameters. The wavelength, λ, is presumed to be the redshifted analogue of λ_e, which represents the fixed, standard wavelength of any specific spectral line, as determined by an observer at the point of emission. All astronomical redshift calculations assume that λ_e is identical with the terrestrial laboratory standard for that spectral line. Thus, dλ_e / dt = dλ_e / dt_e = 0, which is why these terms are missing from Eqs. (7) and (8).

Equation (8) is extraordinary. It demands that, if the universe were governed by Friedmann-Lemaitre expansion, then every photon in the universe would now be experiencing a rate of wavelength change that is dependent on the present value of the Hubble constant, H, as well as its value at the time of emission, H_e, no matter when the emission occurred. Thus, any two presently adjacent photons having identical instantaneous values of λ , one born an hour ago, and the other in a distant galaxy, would exhibit different dλ / dt values because of intrinsic differences due to being imprinted at birth with different values of H_e. This means big-bang cosmology always required a photon's present physical characteristics be determined by a memory of the spacetime expansion conditions at the time of its origin, as well as instantaneous and synchronous action-at-a-distance throughout the cosmos, which also requires a universal time standard.

Part 2 of this series discussed how the effects of spacetime expansion were perceived by various cosmologists. It was noted that the contradictions were sufficient to show the theory must be flawed. Parts 3, 4, and 5 confirmed this, and the present discussion does even more. What is now reported is the discovery that if expansion ever existed, it would have required photons to forever retain an imprint of the Hubble constant at their respective times of emission. This result is so bizarre that it is sufficient in itself to falsify the expansion hypothesis, independent of any other considerations. Actually, however, this result in not surprising at all considering that it is critically hinged on the assumption of the validity of Eq. (6), which, as Part 5 showed, is the fatally flawed connecting link between the real world of astronomy and the imaginary world of spacetime expansion. In one sense we have discovered a second falsification of the expansion hypothesis. It is somewhat puzzling how this extraordinary feature remained undiscovered until now [2].

[1] Steven Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology, (John Wiley& Sons, 1972) pp. 416, 451.

[2] Many thanks to Dave Gentry for useful discussions.